What is a new patient actually worth in a chiropractic practice?
Revenue per visit multiplied by the visits that patient completes. A practice collecting $75 a visit from a patient who finishes a twelve visit plan is looking at $900 for that first course of care. Continuing care after the plan is real money and this tool deliberately ignores it, because a budget built on the visits you hope for is a budget that overspends.
Where do the default numbers come from?
Published chiropractic figures, set at the conservative end. Cash visits are commonly published around $65 to $80 and the MEPS derived mean per visit is about $87, so the tool defaults to $75. Patient visit average is commonly published around twelve. Acquisition cost is published at roughly $150 to $400 per new patient, and the default budget share puts the ceiling at $270, which is the middle of that range rather than the cheap end.
Why is the budget default 30 percent and not 20?
Because the published cost of acquiring a chiropractic patient says so. Our own budgeting standard is about 20 percent of gross revenue for a practice that intends to grow, and it moves up where published acquisition costs demand it. Against a $900 first course of care, the published midpoint acquisition cost is about 30 percent. Setting it lower would make the tool tell you patients are cheaper than they are.
Is my data sent anywhere?
No. The whole tool is arithmetic running in your own browser. There is no form, no submit, no network request, and nothing you type leaves the page. Close the tab and it is gone.
My cost per lead is much lower than this. Am I doing something wrong?
No, you are doing something right, and you should type your real number in. The defaults are set so the tool never promises the cheap case. A practice with a tight direct response offer and a front desk that answers can run well under them, and that shows up immediately as a bigger budget you can justify.
What should I do with the result?
Compare the target cost per lead to what you are actually paying, and compare the leads needed to what you are actually getting. The gap tells you whether your problem is media, the front desk, or the care plan. Those are three different problems with three different fixes, and most practices spend money on the first one when the answer is the second.